<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>Tandem wins, Hancock second</title>
		<description>Discuss Tandem wins, Hancock second</description>
		<link>https://www.stneotscyclingclub.info/time-trials/2012-time-trial-news-and-reports-2/274-tandem-wins-hancock-second</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Apr 2026 13:51:41 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>JComments</generator>
		<atom:link href="https://www.stneotscyclingclub.info/component/jcomments/feed/com_content/274" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<item>
			<title>alec says:</title>
			<link>https://www.stneotscyclingclub.info/time-trials/2012-time-trial-news-and-reports-2/274-tandem-wins-hancock-second#comment-275</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well done to all, and Geoff, that's a super time. Couldn't include the tandem in the handicap as i's much faster. We were 3 minutes or more faster over 10 miles on the tandem compared to solo.]]></description>
			<dc:creator>alec</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:09:50 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.stneotscyclingclub.info/time-trials/2012-time-trial-news-and-reports-2/274-tandem-wins-hancock-second#comment-275</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>GarethS says:</title>
			<link>https://www.stneotscyclingclub.info/time-trials/2012-time-trial-news-and-reports-2/274-tandem-wins-hancock-second#comment-274</link>
			<description><![CDATA[Well done to Geoff and very well done to Mark Greenhow for dipping sub-30. Tandem was interesting to see (thankfully didn't catch me), not sure how you'd work out points if they were club members ...]]></description>
			<dc:creator>GarethS</dc:creator>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 12:00:08 +0100</pubDate>
			<guid>https://www.stneotscyclingclub.info/time-trials/2012-time-trial-news-and-reports-2/274-tandem-wins-hancock-second#comment-274</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
